Compare-Cities.com
Compare Midlothian to Sugar Land
This post compares Midlothian, Texas to Sugar Land, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Midlothian (city) | Sugar Land (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,615 | 86,886 |
| Income (median) | $53,594 | $71,980 |
| Home Value (median) | $170,800 | $292,700 |
| White | 88% | 50% |
| Black | 4% | 6% |
| Asian | 0% | 39% |
| With Kids | 46% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 41 |
| Rentals | 24% | 19% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Midlothian or Sugar Land?
A: Midlothian has a much smaller population count than Sugar Land: 22615 compared with 86886 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Midlothian or in Sugar Land?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Midlothian.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Midlothian or Sugar Land?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Midlothian.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Midlothian does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Midlothian versus 19% for Sugar Land.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Midlothian may include: Burleson, Saginaw, and Kyle.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z