Compare-Cities.com
Compare McKinney to North Richland Hills
This post compares McKinney, Texas to North Richland Hills, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | McKinney (city) | North Richland Hills (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 164,760 | 69,039 |
Income (median) | $59,078 | $47,417 |
Home Value (median) | $255,300 | $171,200 |
White | 77% | 82% |
Black | 11% | 5% |
Asian | 6% | 4% |
With Kids | 46% | 32% |
Age (median) | 35 | 37 |
Rentals | 33% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, McKinney or North Richland Hills?
A: McKinney has a larger population count than North Richland Hills: 164760 compared with 69039 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in McKinney or in North Richland Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in McKinney.
Q: Are homes more expensive in McKinney or North Richland Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in McKinney.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Richland Hills does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 33% for McKinney versus 37% for North Richland Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to McKinney may include: Cedar-Park, Round-Rock, and League-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z