Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Sugar Land
This post compares Lancaster, Texas to Sugar Land, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Sugar Land (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 38,871 | 86,886 |
| Income (median) | $36,556 | $71,980 |
| Home Value (median) | $109,800 | $292,700 |
| White | 25% | 50% |
| Black | 68% | 6% |
| Asian | 0% | 39% |
| With Kids | 46% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 41 |
| Rentals | 39% | 19% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Sugar Land?
A: Lancaster has a much smaller population count than Sugar Land: 38871 compared with 86886 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Sugar Land?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Sugar Land?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Lancaster versus 19% for Sugar Land.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Cedar-Hill, DeSoto, and Fresno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z