Compare-Cities.com
Compare Killeen to North Richland Hills
This post compares Killeen, Texas to North Richland Hills, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Killeen (city) | North Richland Hills (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 140,513 | 69,039 |
Income (median) | $36,170 | $47,417 |
Home Value (median) | $121,900 | $171,200 |
White | 44% | 82% |
Black | 37% | 5% |
Asian | 3% | 4% |
With Kids | 43% | 32% |
Age (median) | 28 | 37 |
Rentals | 54% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Killeen or North Richland Hills?
A: Killeen has a larger population count than North Richland Hills: 140513 compared with 69039 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Killeen or in North Richland Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Killeen.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Killeen or North Richland Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Killeen.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Killeen does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Killeen versus 37% for North Richland Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Killeen may include: Port-Arthur, Beaumont, and Grand-Prairie.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z