Compare-Cities.com
Compare Frisco to North Richland Hills
This post compares Frisco, Texas to North Richland Hills, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Frisco (city) | North Richland Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 155,363 | 69,039 |
| Income (median) | $82,485 | $47,417 |
| Home Value (median) | $335,900 | $171,200 |
| White | 69% | 82% |
| Black | 7% | 5% |
| Asian | 16% | 4% |
| With Kids | 52% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 37 |
| Rentals | 26% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Frisco or North Richland Hills?
A: Frisco has a larger population count than North Richland Hills: 155363 compared with 69039 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Frisco or in North Richland Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Frisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Frisco or North Richland Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Frisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Richland Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 26% for Frisco versus 37% for North Richland Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Frisco may include: Allen, Brushy-Creek, and Coppell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z