Compare-Cities.com
Compare Converse to North Richland Hills
This post compares Converse, Texas to North Richland Hills, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Converse (city) | North Richland Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,919 | 69,039 |
| Income (median) | $44,883 | $47,417 |
| Home Value (median) | $140,200 | $171,200 |
| White | 59% | 82% |
| Black | 20% | 5% |
| Asian | 2% | 4% |
| With Kids | 46% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 37 |
| Rentals | 31% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Converse or North Richland Hills?
A: Converse has a much smaller population count than North Richland Hills: 21919 compared with 69039 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Converse or in North Richland Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Converse.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Converse or North Richland Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Converse.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Richland Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Converse versus 37% for North Richland Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Converse may include: Spring, Grand-Prairie, and Harker-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z