Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burleson to North Richland Hills
This post compares Burleson, Texas to North Richland Hills, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burleson (city) | North Richland Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,296 | 69,039 |
| Income (median) | $50,065 | $47,417 |
| Home Value (median) | $150,600 | $171,200 |
| White | 91% | 82% |
| Black | 3% | 5% |
| Asian | 0% | 4% |
| With Kids | 44% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 37 |
| Rentals | 27% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burleson or North Richland Hills?
A: Burleson has a smaller population count than North Richland Hills: 43296 compared with 69039 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burleson or in North Richland Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Burleson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burleson or North Richland Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Burleson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Richland Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 27% for Burleson versus 37% for North Richland Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burleson may include: Midlothian, Saginaw, and Deer-Park.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z