Compare-Cities.com
Compare Woodburn to Hillsboro
This post compares Woodburn, Oregon to Hillsboro, Oregon across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Woodburn (city) | Hillsboro (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,067 | 102,396 |
| Income (median) | $33,554 | $52,343 |
| Home Value (median) | $167,500 | $282,300 |
| White | 76% | 73% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 11% |
| With Kids | 41% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
| Rentals | 38% | 47% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Woodburn or Hillsboro?
A: Woodburn has a much smaller population count than Hillsboro: 25067 compared with 102396 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Woodburn or in Hillsboro?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Woodburn.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Woodburn or Hillsboro?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Woodburn.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Hillsboro does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Woodburn versus 47% for Hillsboro.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Woodburn may include: Forest-Grove, Keizer, and Newberg.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z