Compare-Cities.com
Compare Woodburn to Gresham
This post compares Woodburn, Oregon to Gresham, Oregon across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Woodburn (city) | Gresham (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,067 | 110,336 |
| Income (median) | $33,554 | $40,875 |
| Home Value (median) | $167,500 | $242,800 |
| White | 76% | 77% |
| Black | 0% | 5% |
| Asian | 1% | 4% |
| With Kids | 41% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 38% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Woodburn or Gresham?
A: Woodburn has a much smaller population count than Gresham: 25067 compared with 110336 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Woodburn or in Gresham?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Woodburn.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Woodburn or Gresham?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Woodburn.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Gresham does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Woodburn versus 46% for Gresham.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Woodburn may include: Forest-Grove, Keizer, and Newberg.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z