Compare-Cities.com
Compare Woodburn to Ashland
This post compares Woodburn, Oregon to Ashland, Oregon across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Woodburn (city) | Ashland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,067 | 20,733 |
| Income (median) | $33,554 | $43,912 |
| Home Value (median) | $167,500 | $392,000 |
| White | 76% | 91% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 2% |
| With Kids | 41% | 21% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 44 |
| Rentals | 38% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Woodburn or Ashland?
A: Woodburn has a similar population count than Ashland: 25067 compared with 20733 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Woodburn or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Woodburn.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Woodburn or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Woodburn.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Woodburn versus 45% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Woodburn may include: Forest-Grove, Keizer, and Newberg.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z