Compare-Cities.com
Compare Klamath Falls to Forest Grove
This post compares Klamath Falls, Oregon to Forest Grove, Oregon across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Klamath Falls (city) | Forest Grove (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,113 | 23,554 |
| Income (median) | $33,015 | $41,689 |
| Home Value (median) | $148,900 | $249,300 |
| White | 85% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 1% | 3% |
| With Kids | 28% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 33 |
| Rentals | 56% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Klamath Falls or Forest Grove?
A: Klamath Falls has a similar population count than Forest Grove: 21113 compared with 23554 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Klamath Falls or in Forest Grove?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Klamath Falls.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Klamath Falls or Forest Grove?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Klamath Falls.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Klamath Falls does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Klamath Falls versus 39% for Forest Grove.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Klamath Falls may include: Springfield, Grants-Pass, and Medford.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z