Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Klamath Falls
This post compares Ashland, Oregon to Klamath Falls, Oregon across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (city) | Klamath Falls (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,733 | 21,113 |
| Income (median) | $43,912 | $33,015 |
| Home Value (median) | $392,000 | $148,900 |
| White | 91% | 85% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 1% |
| With Kids | 21% | 28% |
| Age (median) | 44 | 34 |
| Rentals | 45% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Klamath Falls?
A: Ashland has a similar population count than Klamath Falls: 20733 compared with 21113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Klamath Falls?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Klamath Falls?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Klamath Falls does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Ashland versus 56% for Klamath Falls.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: Milwaukie, Roseburg, and Bend.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z