Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Hillsboro
This post compares Ashland, Oregon to Hillsboro, Oregon across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (city) | Hillsboro (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,733 | 102,396 |
| Income (median) | $43,912 | $52,343 |
| Home Value (median) | $392,000 | $282,300 |
| White | 91% | 73% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 11% |
| With Kids | 21% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 44 | 34 |
| Rentals | 45% | 47% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Hillsboro?
A: Ashland has a much smaller population count than Hillsboro: 20733 compared with 102396 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Hillsboro?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Hillsboro?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Hillsboro does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Ashland versus 47% for Hillsboro.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: Milwaukie, Roseburg, and Bend.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z