Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Gresham
This post compares Ashland, Oregon to Gresham, Oregon across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (city) | Gresham (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,733 | 110,336 |
| Income (median) | $43,912 | $40,875 |
| Home Value (median) | $392,000 | $242,800 |
| White | 91% | 77% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 2% | 4% |
| With Kids | 21% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 44 | 35 |
| Rentals | 45% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Gresham?
A: Ashland has a much smaller population count than Gresham: 20733 compared with 110336 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Gresham?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Gresham?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Gresham does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Ashland versus 46% for Gresham.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: Milwaukie, Roseburg, and Bend.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z