Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oregon to Cuyahoga Falls
This post compares Oregon, Ohio to Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oregon (city) | Cuyahoga Falls (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,085 | 49,329 |
| Income (median) | $49,029 | $44,657 |
| Home Value (median) | $134,500 | $121,700 |
| White | 90% | 91% |
| Black | 2% | 4% |
| Asian | 1% | 1% |
| With Kids | 27% | 26% |
| Age (median) | 44 | 39 |
| Rentals | 31% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oregon or Cuyahoga Falls?
A: Oregon has a much smaller population count than Cuyahoga Falls: 20085 compared with 49329 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oregon or in Cuyahoga Falls?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Oregon.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oregon or Cuyahoga Falls?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Oregon.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cuyahoga Falls does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Oregon versus 37% for Cuyahoga Falls.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oregon may include: Boardman, North-Olmsted, and Stow.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z