Compare-Cities.com
Compare Cuyahoga Falls to Hudson
This post compares Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio to Hudson, Ohio across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Cuyahoga Falls (city) | Hudson (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 49,329 | 22,250 |
Income (median) | $44,657 | $95,734 |
Home Value (median) | $121,700 | $328,800 |
White | 91% | 92% |
Black | 4% | 1% |
Asian | 1% | 3% |
With Kids | 26% | 38% |
Age (median) | 39 | 45 |
Rentals | 37% | 14% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Cuyahoga Falls or Hudson?
A: Cuyahoga Falls has a larger population count than Hudson: 49329 compared with 22250 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Cuyahoga Falls or in Hudson?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Cuyahoga Falls.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Cuyahoga Falls or Hudson?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Cuyahoga Falls.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cuyahoga Falls does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 37% for Cuyahoga Falls versus 14% for Hudson.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Cuyahoga Falls may include: Kettering, Troy, and Massillon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z