Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kirkwood to Kansas City
This post compares Kirkwood, Missouri to Kansas City, Missouri across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kirkwood (city) | Kansas City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,659 | 476,974 |
| Income (median) | $63,785 | $42,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $273,900 | $139,900 |
| White | 89% | 60% |
| Black | 6% | 28% |
| Asian | 1% | 2% |
| With Kids | 28% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 35 |
| Rentals | 24% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kirkwood or Kansas City?
A: Kirkwood has a much smaller population count than Kansas City: 27659 compared with 476974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kirkwood or in Kansas City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Kirkwood.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kirkwood or Kansas City?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Kirkwood.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kansas City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Kirkwood versus 46% for Kansas City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kirkwood may include: Webster-Groves, Oakville, and Raymore.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z