Compare-Cities.com
Compare South St Paul to Savage
This post compares South St Paul, Minnesota to Savage, Minnesota across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South St Paul (city) | Savage (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,280 | 30,011 |
| Income (median) | $46,033 | $60,994 |
| Home Value (median) | $ | $276,100 |
| White | 81% | 80% |
| Black | 3% | 6% |
| Asian | 2% | 8% |
| With Kids | 32% | 44% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 35 |
| Rentals | 0% | 15% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South St Paul or Savage?
A: South St Paul has a smaller population count than Savage: 20280 compared with 30011 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South St Paul or in Savage?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South St Paul.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South St Paul or Savage?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South St Paul.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Savage does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 0% for South St Paul versus 15% for Savage.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South St Paul may include: St-Louis-Park, St-Cloud, and Austin.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z