Compare-Cities.com
Compare South St Paul to Eagan
This post compares South St Paul, Minnesota to Eagan, Minnesota across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South St Paul (city) | Eagan (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,280 | 66,102 |
| Income (median) | $46,033 | $61,373 |
| Home Value (median) | $ | $262,500 |
| White | 81% | 78% |
| Black | 3% | 8% |
| Asian | 2% | 7% |
| With Kids | 32% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 37 |
| Rentals | 0% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South St Paul or Eagan?
A: South St Paul has a much smaller population count than Eagan: 20280 compared with 66102 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South St Paul or in Eagan?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South St Paul.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South St Paul or Eagan?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South St Paul.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eagan does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 0% for South St Paul versus 30% for Eagan.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South St Paul may include: St-Louis-Park, St-Cloud, and Austin.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z