Compare-Cities.com
Compare Savage to South St Paul
This post compares Savage, Minnesota to South St Paul, Minnesota across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Savage (city) | South St Paul (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,011 | 20,280 |
| Income (median) | $60,994 | $46,033 |
| Home Value (median) | $276,100 | $ |
| White | 80% | 81% |
| Black | 6% | 3% |
| Asian | 8% | 2% |
| With Kids | 44% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
| Rentals | 15% | 0% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Savage or South St Paul?
A: Savage has a larger population count than South St Paul: 30011 compared with 20280 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Savage or in South St Paul?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Savage.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Savage or South St Paul?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Savage.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Savage does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 15% for Savage versus 0% for South St Paul.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Savage may include: Cottage-Grove, Woodbury, and Shakopee.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z