Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rochester to South St Paul
This post compares Rochester, Minnesota to South St Paul, Minnesota across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rochester (city) | South St Paul (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,683 | 20,280 |
| Income (median) | $52,157 | $46,033 |
| Home Value (median) | $176,100 | $ |
| White | 80% | 81% |
| Black | 7% | 3% |
| Asian | 7% | 2% |
| With Kids | 32% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
| Rentals | 30% | 0% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rochester or South St Paul?
A: Rochester has a much larger population count than South St Paul: 112683 compared with 20280 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rochester or in South St Paul?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Rochester.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rochester or South St Paul?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Rochester.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rochester does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Rochester versus 0% for South St Paul.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rochester may include: Eagan, Burnsville, and Coon-Rapids.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z