Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rochester to Burnsville
This post compares Rochester, Minnesota to Burnsville, Minnesota across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rochester (city) | Burnsville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,683 | 61,302 |
| Income (median) | $52,157 | $48,728 |
| Home Value (median) | $176,100 | $224,700 |
| White | 80% | 73% |
| Black | 7% | 11% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 32% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 36 |
| Rentals | 30% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rochester or Burnsville?
A: Rochester has a larger population count than Burnsville: 112683 compared with 61302 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rochester or in Burnsville?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Rochester.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rochester or Burnsville?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Rochester.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burnsville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Rochester versus 36% for Burnsville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rochester may include: Eagan, Burnsville, and Coon-Rapids.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z