Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richfield to Chaska
This post compares Richfield, Minnesota to Chaska, Minnesota across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Richfield (city) | Chaska (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 35,993 | 25,578 |
Income (median) | $45,850 | $56,584 |
Home Value (median) | $197,500 | $249,900 |
White | 70% | 89% |
Black | 10% | 2% |
Asian | 7% | 2% |
With Kids | 26% | 38% |
Age (median) | 36 | 36 |
Rentals | 37% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richfield or Chaska?
A: Richfield has a larger population count than Chaska: 35993 compared with 25578 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richfield or in Chaska?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Richfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richfield or Chaska?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Richfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 37% for Richfield versus 30% for Chaska.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richfield may include: Fridley, Burnsville, and Oakdale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z