Compare-Cities.com
Compare Elk River to Burnsville
This post compares Elk River, Minnesota to Burnsville, Minnesota across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Elk River (city) | Burnsville (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,924 | 61,302 |
Income (median) | $57,060 | $48,728 |
Home Value (median) | $229,000 | $224,700 |
White | 92% | 73% |
Black | 2% | 11% |
Asian | 1% | 4% |
With Kids | 41% | 30% |
Age (median) | 37 | 36 |
Rentals | 22% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Elk River or Burnsville?
A: Elk River has a much smaller population count than Burnsville: 23924 compared with 61302 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Elk River or in Burnsville?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Elk River.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Elk River or Burnsville?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Elk River.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burnsville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 22% for Elk River versus 36% for Burnsville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Elk River may include: Chaska, Ramsey, and Rosemount.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z