Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eagan to South St Paul
This post compares Eagan, Minnesota to South St Paul, Minnesota across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eagan (city) | South St Paul (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 66,102 | 20,280 |
| Income (median) | $61,373 | $46,033 |
| Home Value (median) | $262,500 | $ |
| White | 78% | 81% |
| Black | 8% | 3% |
| Asian | 7% | 2% |
| With Kids | 32% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 34 |
| Rentals | 30% | 0% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eagan or South St Paul?
A: Eagan has a larger population count than South St Paul: 66102 compared with 20280 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eagan or in South St Paul?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Eagan.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eagan or South St Paul?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Eagan.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eagan does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Eagan versus 0% for South St Paul.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eagan may include: Apple-Valley, Plymouth, and New-Brighton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z