Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chaska to Richfield
This post compares Chaska, Minnesota to Richfield, Minnesota across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chaska (city) | Richfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,578 | 35,993 |
| Income (median) | $56,584 | $45,850 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,900 | $197,500 |
| White | 89% | 70% |
| Black | 2% | 10% |
| Asian | 2% | 7% |
| With Kids | 38% | 26% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 36 |
| Rentals | 30% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chaska or Richfield?
A: Chaska has a smaller population count than Richfield: 25578 compared with 35993 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chaska or in Richfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Chaska.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chaska or Richfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Chaska.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Chaska versus 37% for Richfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chaska may include: Elk-River, Ramsey, and Rosemount.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z