Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chaska to Burnsville
This post compares Chaska, Minnesota to Burnsville, Minnesota across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chaska (city) | Burnsville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,578 | 61,302 |
| Income (median) | $56,584 | $48,728 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,900 | $224,700 |
| White | 89% | 73% |
| Black | 2% | 11% |
| Asian | 2% | 4% |
| With Kids | 38% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 36 |
| Rentals | 30% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chaska or Burnsville?
A: Chaska has a much smaller population count than Burnsville: 25578 compared with 61302 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chaska or in Burnsville?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Chaska.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chaska or Burnsville?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Chaska.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burnsville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Chaska versus 36% for Burnsville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chaska may include: Elk-River, Ramsey, and Rosemount.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z