Compare-Cities.com
Compare Walker to Kalamazoo
This post compares Walker, Michigan to Kalamazoo, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Walker (city) | Kalamazoo (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,618 | 75,833 |
| Income (median) | $42,301 | $35,338 |
| Home Value (median) | $157,900 | $99,300 |
| White | 89% | 68% |
| Black | 3% | 21% |
| Asian | 2% | 2% |
| With Kids | 27% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 26 |
| Rentals | 39% | 55% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Walker or Kalamazoo?
A: Walker has a much smaller population count than Kalamazoo: 24618 compared with 75833 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Walker or in Kalamazoo?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Walker.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Walker or Kalamazoo?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Walker.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kalamazoo does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Walker versus 55% for Kalamazoo.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Walker may include: Monroe, Portage, and Midland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z