Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sterling Heights to Rochester Hills
This post compares Sterling Heights, Michigan to Rochester Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sterling Heights (city) | Rochester Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 131,996 | 73,458 |
| Income (median) | $50,110 | $72,570 |
| Home Value (median) | $164,700 | $264,400 |
| White | 84% | 80% |
| Black | 5% | 4% |
| Asian | 7% | 11% |
| With Kids | 28% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 41 |
| Rentals | 28% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sterling Heights or Rochester Hills?
A: Sterling Heights has a larger population count than Rochester Hills: 131996 compared with 73458 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sterling Heights or in Rochester Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sterling Heights.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sterling Heights or Rochester Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Sterling Heights.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sterling Heights does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Sterling Heights versus 23% for Rochester Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sterling Heights may include: Portage, Midland, and Warren.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z