Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sterling Heights to Kalamazoo
This post compares Sterling Heights, Michigan to Kalamazoo, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sterling Heights (city) | Kalamazoo (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 131,996 | 75,833 |
| Income (median) | $50,110 | $35,338 |
| Home Value (median) | $164,700 | $99,300 |
| White | 84% | 68% |
| Black | 5% | 21% |
| Asian | 7% | 2% |
| With Kids | 28% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 26 |
| Rentals | 28% | 55% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sterling Heights or Kalamazoo?
A: Sterling Heights has a larger population count than Kalamazoo: 131996 compared with 75833 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sterling Heights or in Kalamazoo?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Sterling Heights.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sterling Heights or Kalamazoo?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Sterling Heights.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kalamazoo does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Sterling Heights versus 55% for Kalamazoo.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sterling Heights may include: Portage, Midland, and Warren.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z