Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sterling Heights to Forest Hills
This post compares Sterling Heights, Michigan to Forest Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sterling Heights (city) | Forest Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 131,996 | 27,599 |
| Income (median) | $50,110 | $79,471 |
| Home Value (median) | $164,700 | $306,400 |
| White | 84% | 92% |
| Black | 5% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 28% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 41 |
| Rentals | 28% | 6% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sterling Heights or Forest Hills?
A: Sterling Heights has a much larger population count than Forest Hills: 131996 compared with 27599 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sterling Heights or in Forest Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sterling Heights.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sterling Heights or Forest Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sterling Heights.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sterling Heights does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Sterling Heights versus 6% for Forest Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sterling Heights may include: Portage, Midland, and Warren.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z