Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sterling Heights to Auburn Hills
This post compares Sterling Heights, Michigan to Auburn Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sterling Heights (city) | Auburn Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 131,996 | 22,644 |
| Income (median) | $50,110 | $50,718 |
| Home Value (median) | $164,700 | $134,600 |
| White | 84% | 60% |
| Black | 5% | 17% |
| Asian | 7% | 16% |
| With Kids | 28% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 30 |
| Rentals | 28% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sterling Heights or Auburn Hills?
A: Sterling Heights has a much larger population count than Auburn Hills: 131996 compared with 22644 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sterling Heights or in Auburn Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Sterling Heights.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sterling Heights or Auburn Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Sterling Heights.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Auburn Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Sterling Heights versus 54% for Auburn Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sterling Heights may include: Portage, Midland, and Warren.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z