Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rochester Hills to Kalamazoo
This post compares Rochester Hills, Michigan to Kalamazoo, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rochester Hills (city) | Kalamazoo (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 73,458 | 75,833 |
| Income (median) | $72,570 | $35,338 |
| Home Value (median) | $264,400 | $99,300 |
| White | 80% | 68% |
| Black | 4% | 21% |
| Asian | 11% | 2% |
| With Kids | 31% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 26 |
| Rentals | 23% | 55% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rochester Hills or Kalamazoo?
A: Rochester Hills has a similar population count than Kalamazoo: 73458 compared with 75833 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rochester Hills or in Kalamazoo?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Rochester Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rochester Hills or Kalamazoo?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Rochester Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kalamazoo does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 23% for Rochester Hills versus 55% for Kalamazoo.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rochester Hills may include: Farmington-Hills, Okemos, and Troy.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z