Compare-Cities.com
Compare Portage to Rochester Hills
This post compares Portage, Michigan to Rochester Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Portage (city) | Rochester Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,072 | 73,458 |
| Income (median) | $49,372 | $72,570 |
| Home Value (median) | $153,800 | $264,400 |
| White | 87% | 80% |
| Black | 5% | 4% |
| Asian | 3% | 11% |
| With Kids | 30% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 41 |
| Rentals | 32% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Portage or Rochester Hills?
A: Portage has a smaller population count than Rochester Hills: 48072 compared with 73458 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Portage or in Rochester Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Portage.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Portage or Rochester Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Portage.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Portage does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Portage versus 23% for Rochester Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Portage may include: Midland, Holt, and Walker.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z