Compare-Cities.com
Compare Port Huron to Kalamazoo
This post compares Port Huron, Michigan to Kalamazoo, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Port Huron (city) | Kalamazoo (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,285 | 75,833 |
| Income (median) | $36,620 | $35,338 |
| Home Value (median) | $77,300 | $99,300 |
| White | 83% | 68% |
| Black | 7% | 21% |
| Asian | 1% | 2% |
| With Kids | 29% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 26 |
| Rentals | 46% | 55% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Port Huron or Kalamazoo?
A: Port Huron has a much smaller population count than Kalamazoo: 29285 compared with 75833 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Port Huron or in Kalamazoo?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Port Huron.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Port Huron or Kalamazoo?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Port Huron.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kalamazoo does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Port Huron versus 55% for Kalamazoo.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Port Huron may include: Adrian, Madison-Heights, and Roseville.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z