Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lansing to Rochester Hills
This post compares Lansing, Michigan to Rochester Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lansing (city) | Rochester Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 115,222 | 73,458 |
| Income (median) | $36,540 | $72,570 |
| Home Value (median) | $77,100 | $264,400 |
| White | 61% | 80% |
| Black | 21% | 4% |
| Asian | 3% | 11% |
| With Kids | 27% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 41 |
| Rentals | 49% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lansing or Rochester Hills?
A: Lansing has a larger population count than Rochester Hills: 115222 compared with 73458 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lansing or in Rochester Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lansing.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lansing or Rochester Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lansing.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lansing does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Lansing versus 23% for Rochester Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lansing may include: Grand-Rapids, Kalamazoo, and Battle-Creek.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z