Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kalamazoo to Walker
This post compares Kalamazoo, Michigan to Walker, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kalamazoo (city) | Walker (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,833 | 24,618 |
| Income (median) | $35,338 | $42,301 |
| Home Value (median) | $99,300 | $157,900 |
| White | 68% | 89% |
| Black | 21% | 3% |
| Asian | 2% | 2% |
| With Kids | 25% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 26 | 35 |
| Rentals | 55% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kalamazoo or Walker?
A: Kalamazoo has a larger population count than Walker: 75833 compared with 24618 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kalamazoo or in Walker?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Kalamazoo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kalamazoo or Walker?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Kalamazoo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kalamazoo does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 55% for Kalamazoo versus 39% for Walker.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kalamazoo may include: Lansing, Mount-Pleasant, and Grand-Rapids.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z