Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kalamazoo to Sterling Heights
This post compares Kalamazoo, Michigan to Sterling Heights, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kalamazoo (city) | Sterling Heights (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,833 | 131,996 |
| Income (median) | $35,338 | $50,110 |
| Home Value (median) | $99,300 | $164,700 |
| White | 68% | 84% |
| Black | 21% | 5% |
| Asian | 2% | 7% |
| With Kids | 25% | 28% |
| Age (median) | 26 | 41 |
| Rentals | 55% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kalamazoo or Sterling Heights?
A: Kalamazoo has a smaller population count than Sterling Heights: 75833 compared with 131996 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kalamazoo or in Sterling Heights?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Kalamazoo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kalamazoo or Sterling Heights?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Kalamazoo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kalamazoo does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 55% for Kalamazoo versus 28% for Sterling Heights.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kalamazoo may include: Lansing, Mount-Pleasant, and Grand-Rapids.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z