Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kalamazoo to Southfield
This post compares Kalamazoo, Michigan to Southfield, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kalamazoo (city) | Southfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,833 | 73,228 |
| Income (median) | $35,338 | $47,591 |
| Home Value (median) | $99,300 | $124,300 |
| White | 68% | 23% |
| Black | 21% | 70% |
| Asian | 2% | 1% |
| With Kids | 25% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 26 | 42 |
| Rentals | 55% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kalamazoo or Southfield?
A: Kalamazoo has a similar population count than Southfield: 75833 compared with 73228 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kalamazoo or in Southfield?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Kalamazoo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kalamazoo or Southfield?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Kalamazoo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kalamazoo does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 55% for Kalamazoo versus 52% for Southfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kalamazoo may include: Lansing, Mount-Pleasant, and Grand-Rapids.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z