Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kalamazoo to Rochester Hills
This post compares Kalamazoo, Michigan to Rochester Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kalamazoo (city) | Rochester Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,833 | 73,458 |
| Income (median) | $35,338 | $72,570 |
| Home Value (median) | $99,300 | $264,400 |
| White | 68% | 80% |
| Black | 21% | 4% |
| Asian | 2% | 11% |
| With Kids | 25% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 26 | 41 |
| Rentals | 55% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kalamazoo or Rochester Hills?
A: Kalamazoo has a similar population count than Rochester Hills: 75833 compared with 73458 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kalamazoo or in Rochester Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Kalamazoo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kalamazoo or Rochester Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Kalamazoo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kalamazoo does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 55% for Kalamazoo versus 23% for Rochester Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kalamazoo may include: Lansing, Mount-Pleasant, and Grand-Rapids.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z