Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kalamazoo to Lincoln Park
This post compares Kalamazoo, Michigan to Lincoln Park, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kalamazoo (city) | Lincoln Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,833 | 37,028 |
| Income (median) | $35,338 | $39,792 |
| Home Value (median) | $99,300 | $64,700 |
| White | 68% | 78% |
| Black | 21% | 7% |
| Asian | 2% | 0% |
| With Kids | 25% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 26 | 37 |
| Rentals | 55% | 31% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kalamazoo or Lincoln Park?
A: Kalamazoo has a larger population count than Lincoln Park: 75833 compared with 37028 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kalamazoo or in Lincoln Park?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Kalamazoo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kalamazoo or Lincoln Park?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Kalamazoo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kalamazoo does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 55% for Kalamazoo versus 31% for Lincoln Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kalamazoo may include: Lansing, Mount-Pleasant, and Grand-Rapids.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z