Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kalamazoo to Burton
This post compares Kalamazoo, Michigan to Burton, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kalamazoo (city) | Burton (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,833 | 28,856 |
| Income (median) | $35,338 | $39,737 |
| Home Value (median) | $99,300 | $80,500 |
| White | 68% | 87% |
| Black | 21% | 7% |
| Asian | 2% | 0% |
| With Kids | 25% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 26 | 40 |
| Rentals | 55% | 26% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kalamazoo or Burton?
A: Kalamazoo has a larger population count than Burton: 75833 compared with 28856 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kalamazoo or in Burton?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Kalamazoo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kalamazoo or Burton?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Kalamazoo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kalamazoo does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 55% for Kalamazoo versus 26% for Burton.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kalamazoo may include: Lansing, Mount-Pleasant, and Grand-Rapids.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z