Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kalamazoo to Auburn Hills
This post compares Kalamazoo, Michigan to Auburn Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kalamazoo (city) | Auburn Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,833 | 22,644 |
| Income (median) | $35,338 | $50,718 |
| Home Value (median) | $99,300 | $134,600 |
| White | 68% | 60% |
| Black | 21% | 17% |
| Asian | 2% | 16% |
| With Kids | 25% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 26 | 30 |
| Rentals | 55% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kalamazoo or Auburn Hills?
A: Kalamazoo has a larger population count than Auburn Hills: 75833 compared with 22644 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kalamazoo or in Auburn Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Kalamazoo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kalamazoo or Auburn Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Kalamazoo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kalamazoo does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 55% for Kalamazoo versus 54% for Auburn Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kalamazoo may include: Lansing, Mount-Pleasant, and Grand-Rapids.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z