Compare-Cities.com
Compare Jackson to Auburn Hills
This post compares Jackson, Michigan to Auburn Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Jackson (city) | Auburn Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,875 | 22,644 |
| Income (median) | $33,625 | $50,718 |
| Home Value (median) | $63,200 | $134,600 |
| White | 71% | 60% |
| Black | 22% | 17% |
| Asian | 0% | 16% |
| With Kids | 35% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 45% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Jackson or Auburn Hills?
A: Jackson has a larger population count than Auburn Hills: 32875 compared with 22644 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Jackson or in Auburn Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Jackson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Jackson or Auburn Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Jackson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Auburn Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Jackson versus 54% for Auburn Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Jackson may include: Muskegon, Battle-Creek, and Wyoming.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z