Compare-Cities.com
Compare Forest Hills to Sterling Heights
This post compares Forest Hills, Michigan to Sterling Heights, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Forest Hills (CDP) | Sterling Heights (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,599 | 131,996 |
| Income (median) | $79,471 | $50,110 |
| Home Value (median) | $306,400 | $164,700 |
| White | 92% | 84% |
| Black | 0% | 5% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 42% | 28% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 41 |
| Rentals | 6% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Forest Hills or Sterling Heights?
A: Forest Hills has a much smaller population count than Sterling Heights: 27599 compared with 131996 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Forest Hills or in Sterling Heights?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Forest Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Forest Hills or Sterling Heights?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Forest Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sterling Heights does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 6% for Forest Hills versus 28% for Sterling Heights.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Forest Hills may include: Rochester-Hills, Birmingham, and Holt.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z