Compare-Cities.com
Compare Forest Hills to Auburn Hills
This post compares Forest Hills, Michigan to Auburn Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Forest Hills (CDP) | Auburn Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,599 | 22,644 |
| Income (median) | $79,471 | $50,718 |
| Home Value (median) | $306,400 | $134,600 |
| White | 92% | 60% |
| Black | 0% | 17% |
| Asian | 4% | 16% |
| With Kids | 42% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 30 |
| Rentals | 6% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Forest Hills or Auburn Hills?
A: Forest Hills has a similar population count than Auburn Hills: 27599 compared with 22644 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Forest Hills or in Auburn Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Forest Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Forest Hills or Auburn Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Forest Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Auburn Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 6% for Forest Hills versus 54% for Auburn Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Forest Hills may include: Rochester-Hills, Birmingham, and Holt.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z