Compare-Cities.com
Compare Flint to Auburn Hills
This post compares Flint, Michigan to Auburn Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Flint (city) | Auburn Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 97,810 | 22,644 |
| Income (median) | $31,315 | $50,718 |
| Home Value (median) | $28,200 | $134,600 |
| White | 39% | 60% |
| Black | 53% | 17% |
| Asian | 0% | 16% |
| With Kids | 32% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 30 |
| Rentals | 42% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Flint or Auburn Hills?
A: Flint has a much larger population count than Auburn Hills: 97810 compared with 22644 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Flint or in Auburn Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Flint.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Flint or Auburn Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Flint.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Auburn Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Flint versus 54% for Auburn Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Flint may include: Saginaw, Eastpointe, and Pontiac.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z