Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burton to Rochester Hills
This post compares Burton, Michigan to Rochester Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burton (city) | Rochester Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,856 | 73,458 |
| Income (median) | $39,737 | $72,570 |
| Home Value (median) | $80,500 | $264,400 |
| White | 87% | 80% |
| Black | 7% | 4% |
| Asian | 0% | 11% |
| With Kids | 31% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 41 |
| Rentals | 26% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burton or Rochester Hills?
A: Burton has a much smaller population count than Rochester Hills: 28856 compared with 73458 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burton or in Rochester Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Burton.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burton or Rochester Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Burton.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burton does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 26% for Burton versus 23% for Rochester Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burton may include: Dearborn-Heights, Lincoln-Park, and Bay-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z