Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burton to Auburn Hills
This post compares Burton, Michigan to Auburn Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burton (city) | Auburn Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,856 | 22,644 |
| Income (median) | $39,737 | $50,718 |
| Home Value (median) | $80,500 | $134,600 |
| White | 87% | 60% |
| Black | 7% | 17% |
| Asian | 0% | 16% |
| With Kids | 31% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 30 |
| Rentals | 26% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burton or Auburn Hills?
A: Burton has a larger population count than Auburn Hills: 28856 compared with 22644 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burton or in Auburn Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Burton.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burton or Auburn Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Burton.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Auburn Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 26% for Burton versus 54% for Auburn Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burton may include: Dearborn-Heights, Lincoln-Park, and Bay-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z