Compare-Cities.com
Compare Birmingham to Sterling Heights
This post compares Birmingham, Michigan to Sterling Heights, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Birmingham (city) | Sterling Heights (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,836 | 131,996 |
| Income (median) | $98,316 | $50,110 |
| Home Value (median) | $467,700 | $164,700 |
| White | 91% | 84% |
| Black | 2% | 5% |
| Asian | 2% | 7% |
| With Kids | 29% | 28% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 41 |
| Rentals | 25% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Birmingham or Sterling Heights?
A: Birmingham has a much smaller population count than Sterling Heights: 20836 compared with 131996 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Birmingham or in Sterling Heights?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Birmingham.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Birmingham or Sterling Heights?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Birmingham.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sterling Heights does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 25% for Birmingham versus 28% for Sterling Heights.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Birmingham may include: Forest-Hills, Rochester-Hills, and Novi.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z